# ART Report: Resource Machine

**URL:** https://forum.anoma.net/t/art-report-resource-machine/371
**Category:** RM
**Created:** [November 14, 2023, 12:44pm UTC](https://forum.anoma.net/t/art-report-resource-machine/371 "2023-11-14T12:44:53Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 20

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![cwgoes](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex013/user_avatar/forum.anoma.net/cwgoes/32/22_2.png) [@cwgoes](https://forum.anoma.net/u/cwgoes)
#### Post date: [November 22, 2023, 9:17am UTC](https://forum.anoma.net/t/art-report-resource-machine/371/20 "2023-11-22T09:17:06Z")

</div>

> [@xuyang](#):
>
> So we won’t support the whitelist/blacklist examples, in which we need to check for all resources? I remember It was a classic example we wanted to achieve. And it might be reasonable for a user to refuse to receive a specified Token or from some senders.

We won’t support this for now. In order to support this and preserve privacy, we need a slightly different implementation (see the discussions [here](https://forum.anoma.net/t/forall-negative-checks-in-resource-logics/336)) - curious how complicated you think this would be. If it’s easy we can scope it in to the next version of the resource machine report.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.anoma.net/t/art-report-resource-machine/371)._