# Crossing the Chasm with Shielded Actions

**URL:** <https://forum.anoma.net/t/crossing-the-chasm-with-shielded-actions/2586>\
**Category:** Applications\
**Created:** [February 3, 2026, 9:09pm UTC](https://forum.anoma.net/t/crossing-the-chasm-with-shielded-actions/2586 "2026-02-03T21:09:42Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 6

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ArtemG](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/45deac/32.png) [@ArtemG](https://forum.anoma.net/u/ArtemG)\
**Post date:** [March 3, 2026, 5:04pm UTC](https://forum.anoma.net/t/crossing-the-chasm-with-shielded-actions/2586/6 "2026-03-03T17:04:45Z")

</div>

> [@adrian](#):
>
> Anything above that fixed rate due to market movements just because a fee for us

Just in case I wanted to mention that it is not the only way we can deal with fees in the AnomaSwap. We discussed this with @graphomath but generally there is nothing stopping us from implementing a design in which e.g. we get only a part of the suprlus or even none (i.e. user gets all of it)\[1\] just in several EVM txs instead of one, but still possibly private.

* * *

1. currently actually this is what the code practically does as the surplus is just left at the hotwallet

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.anoma.net/t/crossing-the-chasm-with-shielded-actions/2586)._